Use this page for
Structured product feedback, compatibility questions, and business inquiries.
The contact route is now framed as a specific workflow, not a generic mailbox.
Use this form for bug reports, feature requests, compatibility questions, and business inquiries. Anonymous analytics and structured feedback stay separate.
This page now treats feedback as a specific product-support workflow instead of a generic contact box.
TelemetryDeck remains for anonymous behavior events only. This contact form and the app feedback modal now post into the same website-owned feedback routes, not into analytics and not into Tina content storage.
This page is for situations where a support article or compatibility note is not enough and the user needs a reply. That includes bug reports, feature requests, compatibility questions, and business inquiries that need context.
The website feedback loop is intentionally separate from anonymous analytics. In later phases, the same structured feedback model can be shared by both the website and the ScopeDock app, but it should still remain distinct from anonymous behavior measurement.
This page should also help people choose not to send feedback when they do not need to. If support, compatibility, or product guidance already answers the question, those pages should stay the faster route.
These direct answer blocks keep feedback routing, privacy boundaries, and support escalation understandable at a glance.
Use this page for
The contact route is now framed as a specific workflow, not a generic mailbox.
Not used for
TelemetryDeck remains limited to anonymous behavior events and does not carry structured feedback content.
Best next step
The site now routes simple questions toward self-serve pages before escalating to structured feedback.
Backend status
The website keeps content pages prerendered while /feedback and related routes stay server-backed for structured feedback intake.
The first website phase only includes the front-end form and interface adaptation layer. It does not store feedback in TinaCMS or mix it into anonymous analytics.
Capture feedback type, industry, message, and optional contact information for later follow-up.
Ask about camera types, protocols, source counts, or expected system behavior when deciding whether ScopeDock is a fit.
Use the same path for partner conversations, integration questions, or workflow discussions that need context.
The contact page should not be the first stop for simple setup or compatibility questions when a faster self-serve path already exists.
Start here for troubleshooting, quick-start guidance, and common product questions.
Use this path for platform support, source coverage, and known limits before testing ScopeDock.
Use the product page if you still need the clearest explanation of what ScopeDock is and who it fits.
Read product updates, setup articles, and workflow guides before escalating to feedback.
Better feedback starts with enough context to understand the setup, the expected behavior, and the actual result.
Setup details
Include whether you are using USB UVC, RTSP, ONVIF discovery, or another device path when relevant.
Environment
Share the operating system, app version, and any setup conditions that help reproduce the issue or question.
Outcome
A short contrast between expected behavior and actual behavior makes compatibility and bug triage much faster.
Follow-up
The form can collect optional contact information, but only use it when a real follow-up is needed.
Keep the page static-first while posting to the website backend at
/feedback. If needed, you can still override the public endpoint with
PUBLIC_FEEDBACK_ENDPOINT. The app can reuse the same payload contract through
its own configured feedback endpoint.
Start with compatibility or support if you want direct answers faster, then use feedback when something still needs follow-up.